‘… we are not even authorized to consider the exceptional case of Archaeopteryx as a true link. By link, we mean a necessary stage of transition between classes such as reptiles and birds, or between smaller groups. An animal displaying characters belonging to two different groups cannot be treated as a true link as long as the intermediary stages have not been found, and as long as the mechanism of transition remains unknown.’ [Human Destiny] Evolutionist Lecomte du Noüy
Hahaha, you're citing a quote from the 1800s as being authoritative on the topic? Really?
.
Towerwatchman,
Why don't you read the finding of experts in the field of archaeology, taxonomy, and stratigraphy instead of the empty assertions a someone who was not an expert in the field and never researched Archaeopteryx?
Why don't you read what those who actually have taken the time to do their due diligence (research, analysis, peer review, and publication) have to say instead of just cherry picking quotes that tickle your ears?
Here's what real science on Acheopteryx actually looks like:
https://bioloskiblog.files.wordpress.com/2013/06/nature2013godefroit.pdf
http://www.senckenberg.de/files/content/forschung/abteilung/terrzool/ornithologie/archaeopteryx.pdf
http://hs.umt.edu/dbs/flightlab/EvolutionofAvianFlightMusclesandConstraintsonPerformance.pdf